These
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/809d8/809d84e5e779681a33c2082ed283c0cd294f70ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c022a/c022aa6a8286a88be2a7b69159fb7ada391562e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f14f7/f14f7816fa2ac43c21677f6ec753458201254274" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd23/bdd230cc20248b991c5bfd7c5daaca33dd783a00" alt=""
models have iris scanners, bigger screens and dual cameras. Both have 4K display and wireless headphone compatibility. The bodies are heavy on the glass usage and we’ve also got a strong metal frame all around. The device has a vibe that reminds me of a ZenFone 3 maybe, but with narrower bezels and a slimmer format. My only gripe with the renders is the scaling of the UI elements, that’s been done a bit too stretched.
Also, I’m not sure if Lenovo will let Motorola use that “skater-like” logo version of the RAZR. It feels like it’s drawn with a sharpie. If I had to choose, I’d go with the RAZR Plus, since it seems to look a bit better. Since Moto already pulled off a 5.2 mm phone, the Moto Z, why not go slimmer?
No comments :
Post a Comment